I try to slice words up in a way that ends up with as few graphemes as possible (Occam’s Razor and all that), so I put AU as in laugh, aunt and draught under /ar/ and GH as in cough, trough, rough, tough, enough and laugh in another group, and that way I don’t need a separate UGH as in laugh. Of course you might argue UGH better reflects the underlying morphology but my organising system for these particular lists is phonology (which doesn’t mean I don’t teach kids about morphology).
I prefer to take an Occam’s Razor approach, minimising the total number of graphemes, so slice “laugh” into l+au+gh:
au as in aunt, draught and laugh,
gh as in cough, rough, laugh.
ugh as in laugh
I try to slice words up in a way that ends up with as few graphemes as possible (Occam’s Razor and all that), so I put AU as in laugh, aunt and draught under /ar/ and GH as in cough, trough, rough, tough, enough and laugh in another group, and that way I don’t need a separate UGH as in laugh. Of course you might argue UGH better reflects the underlying morphology but my organising system for these particular lists is phonology (which doesn’t mean I don’t teach kids about morphology).
I prefer to take an Occam’s Razor approach, minimising the total number of graphemes, so slice “laugh” into l+au+gh:
au as in aunt, draught and laugh,
gh as in cough, rough, laugh.